Courts in most jurisdictions, however, also require the plaintiff to prove the interference caused harm to the business in some way, which in most cases is financial.
If a valid contract exists and the defendant's knowing breach of it can be documented, this is a straightforward way to demonstrate tortuous interference in a civil court. It also would not qualify as tort if the defendant did not use coercion to interfere with a business contract, and/or did not intend the loss of a business opportunity. If the defendant can show the interference was accidental or unintentional, then the defendant is not guilty of tort. Furthermore, the interference with a business contract must be intentional and the contract itself must be valid. Interference with a Business ContractĪs implied, this type of interference requires a formal business agreement or contract already be in place and then be interfered with. Whether committed by an individual against a business, a business against a business, or a business against an individual, tortuous interference is divided into two main types: Contract interference and business relations interference. Such interference is referred to as a business tort. By extension, businesses themselves can commit torts against individuals or other businesses. On its own, a 'tort' is when reasonable care or deference to another person is disregarded. Wrongful interference in a business relationship is referred to by legal experts as a tortuous interference. Elements of a Wrongful Interference Business Case Proving Interference Occurred with a Business Relationship 4.
0 kommentar(er)
